WELCOME TO JURNAL REKONSTRUKSI DAN ESTETIK

 WELCOME TO  JURNAL REKONSTRUKSI DAN ESTETIK    Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga    ISSN International Center  |   p-ISSN:2301-793...

COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES OF EARLY VERSUS DELAYED WOUND GRAFTING IN BURN PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

 


🔥 Does Timing Matter in Burn Wound Grafting? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Burn injuries remain a major global health burden, with more than 265 million cases annually worldwide. Surgical skin grafting is a cornerstone in burn management, yet the optimal timing of grafting, whether early or delayed continues to be debated, especially in settings with limited resources.

This systematic review and meta-analysis published in Jurnal Rekonstruksi dan Estetik (JRE) evaluates the clinical and functional outcomes of early versus delayed wound grafting in burn patients.

📄 Article Title:
Comparative Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Wound Grafting in Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
🔗 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jre.v10i2.75022

📌 Why This Study Matters

Early excision and grafting,traditionally performed within 48 hours to 7 days is believed to:

  • Reduce infection risk

  • Shorten hospital stay

  • Improve functional recovery

  • Lower morbidity and mortality

However, factors such as hemodynamic instability, inadequate resuscitation, and limited surgical resources often delay intervention, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study provides evidence-based guidance to support clinical decision-making.

🔍 Methods at a Glance

  • Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Search period: July 2024 – January 2025

  • Study types included:

    • Randomized controlled trials

    • Cohort studies

    • Observational studies

  • Comparison groups:

    • Early grafting (within 3–7 days)

    • Delayed grafting (after 7 days)

  • Outcomes assessed:

    • Length of hospital stay

    • Infection rates

    • Blood loss

    • Limb and hand function (TAM & grip strength)

📊 Key Results

  • 250 studies identified, 7 studies met inclusion criteria

  • Hospital stay:

    • Early grafting significantly reduced hospitalization by
      8.89 days
      (95% CI: −12.88 to −4.89)

  • Functional outcomes:

    • Early grafting showed significantly better Total Active Movement (TAM)
      MD: 22.10 (95% CI: 17.95 to 26.24)

  • Other outcomes:

    • No statistically significant differences between early and delayed grafting in:

      • Blood loss

      • Infection rates

      • Post-operative grip strength

🧠 Clinical Interpretation

Early wound grafting offers clear benefits in:

  • Faster recovery

  • Shorter hospital stay

  • Improved postoperative limb mobility

⚠️ However, early grafting did not significantly outperform delayed grafting in terms of infection rates or blood loss, highlighting the importance of patient condition and surgical readiness rather than timing alone.

🎯 Key Takeaways

  • Early grafting improves functional recovery and hospitalization outcomes

  • Timing should be balanced with patient stability and resource availability

  • Supports early intervention when clinically feasible

  • Calls for further high-quality studies to refine timing protocols

📚 Published in: Jurnal Rekonstruksi dan Estetik
✍️ Authors: Rafeni Bunga, Beta Subakti Nata’admaja
🏥 Affiliations:

  • Mayapada Hospital Surabaya

  • Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

🔗 Read the full article:
https://doi.org/10.20473/jre.v10i2.75022

#BurnInjury #SkinGrafting #EarlyGrafting #DelayedGrafting #BurnManagement #ReconstructiveSurgery #PlasticSurgery #SystematicReview #MetaAnalysis #EvidenceBasedMedicine #FunctionalOutcome
 #WoundCare #HospitalStay #ClinicalDecisionMaking #JRE #JREUnair